beta
(영문) 광주고등법원(전주) 2015.01.15 2014나678

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is as follows: (a) the relevant part of the judgment of the court of the first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance, in addition to the use of the following part of the judgment of the court of the first instance as stated in paragraph (2). Therefore, it is citing

2. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, each of the “construction by Defendant Thai” in Section 7 of Chapter 5 shall be applied to each of the “Defendant Thai House”.

Part VI of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be " March 9, 2012" in Part VI of the judgment of the court of first instance as " March 9, 2012 and March 1, 2013."

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is justified with this conclusion. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.