However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 업무방해 피고인과 B은 2012. 10. 23. 23:30경 피해자 C이 운영하는 서울 은평구 D호프집' 안에서, 만취한 피고인과 B에게 술을 팔지 않는다는 말에 화가 나, B은 피해자 C에게 “개 같은 년, 썅년, 사시미로 담가버리겠다.”라고 큰 소리로 욕설을 하며 강냉이 바구니를 집어던져 그녀의 얼굴을 맞히고 깨진 맥주병을 집어 들어 이를 제지하는 호프집 손님인 E을 향하여 깨진 맥주병을 집어던지고, 피고인은 그곳 손님들에게 “이런 개새끼들 사시미로 담가버리겠다.”라고 큰 소리로 욕설을 하며 약 30분간 행패를 부렸다.

Accordingly, the customers who had drinking in the door-line without calculating the play, and the customers who had entered the house did not enter the house.

As a result, the defendant and B interfered with the victim C's heading business by force.

2. The Defendant and B violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) committed joint assault against the victim E by cutting away their arms from the date and time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the scene of damage and photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) or 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of a punishment, Article 2 (2) or (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant is against his/her will and has lived faithfully without any particular criminal power