(영문) 대구고등법원 1984. 12. 14. 선고 84구237 판결[종합소득세부과처분취소][판례집불게재]
Oi-Hyi et al. (Attorney Park Jong-dae et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)
Head of Central Tax Office
November 9, 1984
All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
Litigation costs are assessed against the plaintiffs.
As of November 5, 1983, the imposition of global income tax of KRW 4,867,439 and that of KRW 1,116,796 and that of the defense tax of KRW 1,796, global income tax of KRW 44,728 and that of KRW 4,472 as of the same day as of the same day of the year 1983 and the defense tax of KRW 86,547 and that of KRW 8,654 of the defense tax of KRW 1983 as of the same day of the year 1983 shall be revoked. The litigation cost shall be borne by the defendant.
(1) The defendant determined the tax base amount for 1983.15 】 200 won for 1982, 47, 300 won for interest income of 40, 500 won for 196, 300 won for 47, 400 won for 197, 300 won for 50, 470 won for interest income of 50, 300 won for 196, 300 won for 47, 300 won for 196, 47, 300 won for interest income of 50, 300 won for 196, 47, 97, 300 won for 20, 97, 300 won for interest income of 46, 97, 300 won for 196, 300 won for 20, 200 won for 196,
On April 22, 1982, the plaintiffs were transferred to the above 20-day Kim Young-chul, Kim Jong-chul, Kim Jong-chul, 200 won for the above 20-year interest rate of 10,000 won for the above 20-year interest rate of 30,000 won for the above 20-year interest rate of 10,000 won for the above 20-year interest rate of 30,000 won for the above 20-year interest rate of 10,000 won for the above 30-year interest rate of 20,000 won for the above 30-year interest rate of 190,000 won for the above 20-year interest rate of 10,000 won for the above 30-year interest rate of 20,000 won for the above 30-year interest rate of 30,000 won for the above 30-year interest rate of 1,030.
Therefore, the defendant's separate disposition of objection is legitimate, and the plaintiffs' claims for revocation are dismissed in entirety, and the costs of lawsuit are assessed against the defendant by applying Article 14 of the Administrative Litigation Act and Articles 89 and 93 of the Civil Procedure Act.
December 14, 1984
Judges Ansan-sik (Presiding Judge)
[Attachment Omission (Real Estate List)]