Of the judgment of the first instance against B, the part against the defendant exceeding the money ordered to be paid below.

A. On September 1, 2005, Plaintiff B is a person who registered the business of fish farming in the name of “I” and is engaged in the fish farming business, such as fish farming.

Plaintiff

B Pursuant to Article 11 of the Inland Water Fisheries Act, on August 24, 2005, the types and methods of fishing business were 10,877m2 (water tank 431m2), 10,877m2 (water tank 431m2) in terms of land, 10,877m2 (water tank 431m2), 24 August 24, 2005 to August 23, 2008, 201m209: (a) the period of validity of fishing business was from August 24, 2005 to August 23, 2008; (b) the type and scale of fishing business at the same place was 10,877m2 (water 431m2); (c) the type and scale of facilities; (d) the period of validity of fishing business from January 29, 2009 to the 201m29.

B. On April 16, 2003, Plaintiff A is a person who registered the business of inland fish farming and engages in fish farming business, etc. under the trade name of “E” in Duyangyang-gun D.

Plaintiff

A Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11 of the Inland Water Fisheries Act, on February 14, 2006, the types and methods of fishing business on February 14, 2006: (a) farming business on land; (b) fishing business on inland water tanks; (c) fishing business on inland water tanks; (d) fishing business on inland water tanks; (e) fishing business on inland water tanks; (e) the type and scale of facilities; and (e) the type and scale of facilities are 1,425 square meters in index-type; (e) fishing business on inland water (e.g., fish farms, etc.); and (g) fishing business reporting (g) from February 14, 2006 to February 13, 2011; and (e) again at the same place on the same date, the types and scale of facilities are 11,425 square meters in index-type, 425 square meters in water size.