However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

1. On March 8, 2014, at around 23:30 on March 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) took the influence of alcohol in the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D, Kimhae-si; (b) without any justifiable reason, the Defendant expressed 10 minutes of the victim’s restaurant business by means of a large amount of “influence of the inside money”, “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.” on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the victim’s restraint, and interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. At around 23:45 on the same day, the Defendant, at the same place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1), expressed that “the victim G belonging to the F District District of the Kim Sea Police Station, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report of 112, in the situation where many people, such as the said D and cafeteria employees, etc., are able to read “the victim’s slope H, who was sent to the site” as “the victim’s slope H, who was sent to the site, was able to read as “the victim’s slope, who was frightened, frightened, fright, frighten, etc., and who was frightened.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and H;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult), and the choice of each imprisonment line;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Taking into account the fact that agreement has been reached with the victim D);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;