농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who actually operates a restaurant called “C” in Sinpo City B.
In addition, a person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof, such as the defendant, shall not make a false indication of origin or make an indication that may cause confusion with the country of origin.
However, from January 20, 2018 to October 2, 2019, the Defendant purchased approximately 112 gambling (total amounting to KRW 1,127 g, 975,800) domestically-in Korean traditional kimchi from Da “E” and offered and sold it in the restaurant operated by the Defendant, and the Defendant indicated the origin of the “flochi” as “domestic products” even though he indicated the “flochi” on the “flochi” bulletin in the restaurant, in spite of having indicated the “glochi” on the “glochi” bulletin, the Defendant indicated the origin of the “flochi” as “domestic products.”
Accordingly, the defendant made a mark that could cause confusion about the country of origin.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. 13 copies of photographs at the scene of detection of the violation place, investigation reports (inspection of details of transactions by distributors), C food materials transaction details, copies of business registration certificates, copy of business registration certificates, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (specific amount of violation);
1. Article 14 (1) and Article 6 (2) of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products through Relevant Provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and the Selection of Punishment;
1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;
1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;
1. According to Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence of sentence, the term “kim mar” in Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act appears to have indicated “kim kim kim kim kim kim kim kim” immediately adjacent to “kim kim kim kim kim kim kim kim kim kim kim kim kim kim kim kim kim kim kim kim kim k