However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around April 2012, the Defendant forged a motor vehicle registration number plate for the purpose of exercising his/her name on the front garage of the petition-gu C apartment, the Defendant: (a) obtained a Sticker’s registration number on which the name of the company cannot be known from the advertising company; and (b) forged a motor vehicle registration number plate for the purpose of uttering.

2. The Defendant attached the forged motor vehicle registration number plate as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) to the relevant truck, and around April 5, 2013, the Defendant exercised the forged motor vehicle registration number plate, which was the air conditioners, by having E operate the relevant truck.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of vehicles, vehicle number plates and photographs of seized vehicles;

1. Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 238 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (aggravated Punishment of Crimes of Counterfeiting False Air or Uttering with Other Crimes)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is not to be mitigated, but the punishment shall be determined by taking into consideration the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s mistake reflects the Defendant’s mistake; (b) the circumstances leading to the commission of the crime; (c) the Defendant’s age; (d) the character and conduct; (d) the occupation, family relationship; and