If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On June 20, 2016, the Defendant

1. Public mission: the construction of new C building in ancient cities;

2. The place of construction: Goyang-si C and the date of commencement: June 2015; the scheduled date of completion: May 2017; the contract amount: 00 million won per day and ten million won per day and the name of the contractor (project owner): D; output and affix a seal of D which is prepared in advance on each name of D.

Accordingly, the defendant, without authority, forged the standard contract for private construction works in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. On June 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) submitted a copy of the standard contract for private construction works in the name of forgery D, as if it were a document duly formed, to a staff in charge of watching the 10-day high view view in Gyeyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu; and (b) exercised the said investigation document as if it were a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. An additional statement of complaint (Counterfeiting private documents);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the agreement, the provisional seizure or release bank;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of the above investigation document), and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;