beta
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2016.04.12 2015가단23789

손해배상

Text

1. Defendant B: 5% per annum from September 26, 2015 to April 12, 2016, and from the following day to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Defendant B did not dispute the Plaintiff’s assertion that he embezzled money of the ordered amount from 2011 to 2013 while working at the Plaintiff rice shop, and thus, Defendant B’s claim against Defendant B is with merit.

On the other hand, as to Defendant C, there is no evidence to acknowledge the authenticity of the fidelity Guarantee (A 2). Therefore, the claim against this Defendant is without merit.