According to the facts charged prior to the change against the defendant, the defendant opened and operated a three-day Council member from around August 1968 to November 14, 1969 in the Chungcheongnam-gun budget-gun in the present place of residence, and opened a three-day Council member at the current place of residence, and provided medical services by medication to two or three children, patients, etc. with a single intention. Thus, these unlicensed medical practices are repeated as a single intention and constitute a comprehensive crime. Therefore, if Article 5 of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes (hereinafter "Special Measures"), if the provision of Article 5 of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes is newly established for the purpose of profit-making, all of them shall be punished as a comprehensive crime, and there is no need to do so. Accordingly, according to the records, the prosecutor modified the indictment concerning only the acts after the enforcement of the Special Measures for Public Health Crimes in accordance with due process of law, and the application of the above Special Measures for Public Prosecutor is justified, and it is not justified as violating the principle of no amendment to the amendment.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices of the Supreme Court (Presiding Judge) Park Jae-dong (Presiding Judge)