Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

On June 10, 2016, at around 05:20, the Defendant: (a) reported on the fact that the Defendant was taking a bath to his employees before the main station C located in Suwon-si B, Suwon-si; and (b) the police officer affiliated with the police station D police station in the Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Police Station D, who called the Defendant, asked the Defendant “Isk for the said three son,” and asked the Defendant “Isk for the said three son, Isk for the said E’s drinking, and continued to take a part of the said E one time at a time, and called “Isk for the said son, Isk for the said son’s drinking.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and the prevention of crimes by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph the images;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;