C. Attorney C.

Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, it is just to reverse the judgment of the court of first instance that found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case and to have sentenced the Defendant guilty. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle

In addition, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the sentencing of the punishment is unfair

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Kim So-young

Justices Park Sang-ok

Justices Noh Jeong-hee