beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2014.04.17 2014고정160

사문서위조등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 3, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to 2 years of imprisonment with prison labor for violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the Seoul Central District Court on the 11st of the same month, and the judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On October 4, 2010, the Defendant, at the Han Bank Permission point located in the Sinsi-si, the wife Kim Jong-dong, entered the application form for the opening of the bank transaction account B, which was kept for the purpose of exercising, and entered the application form for the opening of the bank transaction account B in the applicant column, and affixed the official seal of the representative director on the next page, forged one copy of the application form for the bank transaction under the name of the B.

In addition, this was delivered to the staff in charge of the above bank as if they were duly drawn up.

2. Around October 4, 2010, the Defendant, at a point south of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea, which is located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Around October 4, 2010, entered the application form for the opening of the bank transaction account No. B, and entered the application form for the opening of the bank transaction account No. B, and affixed the official seal of the representative director on the applicant column, and forged one copy of the application form for the bank transaction under B’s name.

In addition, this was delivered to the staff in charge of the above bank as if they were duly drawn up.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A complaint;

1. Previous records: Criminal records and other inquiries, investigation reports, application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing defendant's statutory statements;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for each crime;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;