If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who has worked from the victim C, which is operated by the victim C in Seopopo City B, as an employee.

1. On December 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by deceiving the victim that the Defendant sent 3.5 0,000 won of the market value of the said gold bank kept in custody at the said gold bank to the customer at a low time; and (b) by disposing of the said medal owned by the victim to another gold bank at a low time; (c) committed a theft by deceiving the victim to the customer;

2. The Defendant, at a low time on December 29, 2017, with one half of the net amount of KRW 4 million equivalent to KRW 1.2 million owned by the victim under the foregoing method as above, thefted by having one half of the total amount of KRW 1.2 million owned by the victim, and one half of the total amount of KRW 8 million.

3. On January 5, 2018, the Defendant: (a) cut off the Victim’s net gold 13 knife worth worth of KRW 2,800,000 owned by the Defendant using the said method as above.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's market price of 550,000 won with four precious metals over three times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to C and E;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. The latter part of Articles 37 and 39 (1) of the Criminal Act (the crime above and the crime for which judgment has become final and conclusive on February 2020) of the Criminal Act to treat concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;