국유재산 대부계약 해지
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. Basic facts
A. (1) On December 31, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into the instant loan agreement, etc.) from the head of Si/Gun in Yando, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, the general property of which falls under the general property (hereinafter “instant land”).
The purpose of use is to obtain a loan as “site” and the term of loan is respectively prescribed as “from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2017” (hereinafter “instant loan agreement”).
A) Article 8 (Cancellation of Loan Agreements) of the instant loan agreement provides that the head of the Gun who can cancel the instant loan agreement if the Plaintiff violated the statutes related to State property and the relevant provisions of the contract, and Article 16 (Interpretation of the contract) provides that “if there is an objection against the provisions of the instant contract, the head of the Gun who appears to be the Plaintiff shall consult and decide on the terms and conditions of the agreement, and if there is no agreement, it shall be governed by the relevant statutes.”
B. On December 23, 2013, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the loan charges of KRW 1,418,860 for the year 2013 (payment deadline December 31, 2013) and the loan charges of KRW 1,546,550 for the year 2014 (payment deadline January 1, 2014). However, on March 24, 2014, the Plaintiff did not pay each of the above loan charges. On March 24, 2014, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the termination of the instant loan agreement pursuant to Article 8(1)5 of the instant loan agreement and Article 36 of the State Property Act.
(c) The head of a central government agency may revoke or withdraw permission under Article 36 of the State Property Act (1) where a person who has obtained permission to use administrative property falls under any of the following:
4...