If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who drives a D taxi, and the victim E is a passenger who uses a defendant's taxi.

1. On July 4, 2013, the Defendant stolen one copy of the victim’s credit card by carrying the victim’s hand in order to pay taxi use fees in front of the domicile of the victim of the F in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and by delivering another card (a new card G).

2. Around 05:20 on July 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) purchased the victim’s credit card at H I convenience stores located in Bupyeong-gu, Busan; (b) and (c) purchased the Modern social aggregate of 1st, Jinish, and beek-ro 1 disease; and (d) presented it to the said convenience store employee as if he was his credit card; and (b) had the said convenience store employee settle 32,500 won with the said tobacco payment, etc., thereby obtaining pecuniary benefits equivalent to the said amount.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act used a stolen credit card by settling accounts equivalent to 32,500 won using the credit card of the Defendant who stolen, at the same time and place as paragraph (2).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of each internal investigation report, investigation report, purchase of goods at convenience stores, receipts for traffic replies, use of new cards, requests for cooperation in relation to taxi use cards, and application of orders to submit financial information and orders to submit financial information;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 329 of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 70 (1) 3 of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act and Article 70 (1) 3 of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, and selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant guilty of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act asserts that he/she did not steals a new card from a victim.

However, each judgment.