However, each of the above two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive is against the Defendants.

around 20:20 on July 21, 2016, the Defendants entered the said sales store with the intention of thefting precious metals, even though they are the intention of thefting precious metals.

The Defendants continued to show the above victims with a different brut and brut, talking as if they were to pay the price for the goods by account transfer, and followed the victim's surrounding eyes with a precious metal of 9,002,00 won in total of the market price of KRW 2,757,000 per 18k brut (10 crut), the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 2,350,000 per 2,35,000 per crut (10 crut), the market price of which is the victim who was on the display stand between the brut and the above victims.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together and invaded the victim's structure jointly.

On July 15, 2016, the Defendants: (a) around 19:14, July 15, 2016, the fact that the sales store operated by the victim G located in Busan-gu Busan-gu was intended to steal precious metals, but entered the sales store and intrudes into the sales store while making it an intention to steal precious metals.

The Defendants continued to show the above victims with having changed their arms, etc. and talked about as if they would pay the price for the goods, and put the victim's surroundings off, followed by having a precious metal equivalent to 11,60,000 won in total of the market price of 24 k k gold bullion (20 k ) equivalent to 3,80,000 won in the market price of the victim's possession on the display stand between one eye and 1,80,000 won in the market price of 3,90,000,000 won in the market price of the above victims.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together and invaded the victim's structure jointly.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The police suspect interrogation protocol of H;

1. Statement to E by the police;