업무정지등처분취소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
3. The Defendant limited to the Plaintiff on December 18, 2015.
The court's explanation of this case is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is based on Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the execution of the disposition of this case is suspended ex officio by applying Article 23 (2) and (3) of the Administrative Litigation Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.