부정당업자 제재처분 취소청구의 소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff is a defense contractor that produces and delivers to the Defendant various goods, such as shooting control devices, heat stoves, etc. of the vehicle prior to KK.
B. On October 2013, the Defense Agency for Technology and Quality Assurance verified the official test report, etc. submitted by the company that supplies the goods to the Defendant, and during that process, the Plaintiff confirmed that the official test report (hereinafter “instant test report”) received from the subcontractor with respect to the 10 goods as indicated in the table 1 (hereinafter “instant goods”) as indicated in the following table 1, submitted by the Plaintiff in the process of performing the contract indicated in the table 1 (hereinafter “instant contract”, and the individual contract is specified by the sequence as indicated in the table 1):
1) Table 1 208010496 ( June 9, 2008) 1208.208 K-104. 208 K-1 and 208 K-1271 ( December 4, 2008) 208 CPSA 1 1 lids for K-1 and 208 K-106 lids for 205 K-1363 (Annual rate, etc. 2010) 1. 1. 205 K-1 and 204. 205 K-1 and 204. 108. 16. 2016. 16. 204. 8. 16. 106. 16. 206.