2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16093, Jan. 1,

The Defendant, together with B, operated C.

No person shall provide services that can display a false phone number of a caller for profit, such as forging a false phone number of a caller.

From April 2015 to August 2015, the Defendant and B provided the Internet telephone line of the said company with the phone number of “E” at C Office of Co., Ltd., Ltd. located in the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea from Apr. 2015 to Mar. 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant in collusion with B provided services such as the change of the caller's phone number for profit-making purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on each investigation report, certified copy of the register, computer-cape data, and Kakao Stockholm dialogue;

1. Article 95-2 (5) and Article 84-2 (2) of the Telecommunications Business Act and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;