협박
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. Around 04:00 on February 17, 2020, the Defendant heard the rumor that the amount of accommodation charges is higher than the amount confirmed by mobile phone display system from the victim C (manam and 39 years of age) who is an employee of the above business establishment, and made a dispute over it, the Defendant threatened the victim by acting in the manner of threatening-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, as the victim’s body would inflict bodily harm.
2. Determination
(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;
(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act.
C. After filing a prosecution, “a written agreement and a written application for non-compliance with punishment” was submitted.
Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act