A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

1. On December 18, 2012, Defendant A sought an additional order for drinking while having friendly B, D, and alcoholic beverage in the Daegu Northern-gu C cafeteria at around 23:50 on December 18, 2012, Defendant A and the above B met this.

Accordingly, the Defendant: (a) laid down the small-scale ward owned by the victim E (n, 58 years of age) who is an employee of the said restaurant; (b) laid down the small-scale ward on the floor; and (c) took a bath to the victim, “Ye, Dok Dok wk wk wk wk wk wn wk wn wn wn wn wn wn wn wn wn wn wn wn wn wn? wn wn wn wn wn wn wn wn? wn wn wn wn wn wn wn

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. On December 19, 2012, the Defendants received a demand from the police slope G belonging to the police officer G belonging to the F District of the Northern Police Station called out, and the police officer G and the police officer H to “booming in a restaurant” at the same place as Paragraph 1, at around 00:27, the Defendants were subject to the demand of the Defendants to “accomponing in a restaurant” at the same time as Paragraph 1.

Accordingly, Defendant A, while speaking as “B,” committed an act on the floor of the instant officers, committed the act of throwing the instant instant instant instant instant cup, and sent it to the said restaurant, but, once again, Defendant B, who was in the next place, was released from the slope G by opening the said restaurant to the said restaurant. Defendant B, who was in the next place, committed an assault, such as cutting down the bridge’s flap and the flap’s clothes, cutting down the flap of the slope G, cutting down the flap of the slope H’s clothes, flaping the flap of the slope G’s flap, and flading the Defendant A by cutting down the flap.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement of E, H and G;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts: Article 314 of the Criminal Act.