도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On June 2, 1995, at around 00:06, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle by the road management agency by operating the vehicle loaded with freight of 11.3 tons on the 2 axis of the above vehicle in excess of 10 tons of the limitation on the weight of the vehicle owned by the Defendant in connection with the Defendant’s business at the road above the 412.5km km at the upstream of the Gyeong-do Highway.
2. The Constitutional Court rendered a decision of unconstitutionality on the portion of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 8315, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 8665, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 2095; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 4777, Jan. 2, 2005; Act No. 83155, Oct. 2, 200) that “if an agent, employee, or other employee of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83(1)2,
3. According to the conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act