However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the husband of the victim C (here, 61).

피고인은 2016. 5. 20. 21:00경 논산시 D에 있는 마을회관 앞 도로에서 술에 취한 피고인을 피해 집에서 나온 피해자에게 “바람피우러 나온 것 아니냐”고 하며 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴을 3-4회 가격하고, 피해자의 멱살을 잡고 마을회관 앞마당으로 끌고 가 바닥에 넘어뜨린 후 뺨을 2회 때리고, 피해자를 논산시 E 소재 피고인과 피해자의 주거지 뒤편으로 끌고 가 넘어뜨린 후 머리채를 잡아 머리를 시멘트 바닥에 3-4회 내리찧은 후, 피해자의 등을 발로 2회 걷어차고, 피해자를 집안으로 끌고 가 거실 소파에 피해자를 내동댕이친 후 무릎으로 배를 찍어 누르고, 목을 조르고, 얼굴을 주먹으로 4-5회 가격하여, 피해자에게 약 3주간의 치료를 요하는 뇌진탕 등 상해를 가하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement by the prosecution against C;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (the 112-Report case handling table and photographs of injured parts);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 257 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant was in a state of mental disability at the time of committing the instant crime.

According to the records of this case, even though the defendant was in a state of drinking at the time of committing the crime of this case, it does not seem that the defendant did not have or lacks the ability to make a decision.

Therefore, the defendant and defense counsel's above assertion is not accepted.

The reason for sentencing [the range of recommendations] general injury (the range of general injury) is the mitigated area (2-1 year) (2-1 year) (including special mitigations) and is not subject to punishment (including serious efforts to recover damage).