When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator or provide such services for a third party's communications.

On September 14, 2017, the Defendant opened one mobile phone in the name of the Defendant at the time of the mobile phone agency located in the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and sold the core (USI) of the above mobile phone through D and E to F, who is a seller of free will, from that time to April 18, 2018, the Defendant provided 90,000 won by opening a total of 20 mobile phone, such as the list of crimes (6) in the attached Table (hereinafter referred to as “the list of crimes”), to F, etc. so that he can use it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation report (data submitted to A by a suspect);

1. Investigation report (Attachment to the judgment, etc. on the F purchaser of oil at the heart);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Article 2018-type 81833, 89175, such as evidence relations, etc.);

1. Article 97 subparagraph 7 of the relevant Act and Articles 97 and 30 of the Telecommunications Business Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;