beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.07.22 2016구단7463

난민불인정결정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea for a short period of time on April 2, 2001, ① a foreigner who falls under the status of stay for short-term (C-2) (amended by Presidential Decree No. 23274, Nov. 1, 201) [Attachment 1] of the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 23274, Nov. 1, 201), or the scope of activities: A foreigner who intends to stay for a short period of time on and after the expiration of the period of stay ( May 2, 2001) (hereinafter referred to as the "period of stay for 5.1) and was granted a non-professional sojourn (E-9) status on and after the expiration of the period of stay for 1.5 days before the expiration of the period of stay (E-1, 207). < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 20150, Mar. 20, 2008>

B. On October 23, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision to recognize refugee status (hereinafter the instant disposition) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would be subject to persecution as a refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap 1, Eul 1, Eul 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion is that the state government owns the land owned by the plaintiff's family.