beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.05.07 2014가단15472

손해배상

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,848,870 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from July 17, 2010 to May 7, 2015.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

B A tax official’s unauthorized disposal of state property B, from November 20, 1971 to November 1, 1974, was working as a tax official in charge of state property management while serving as a tax official in the Maritime Affairs Office and the Maritime Affairs Office.

At the time, employees engaged in the affairs related to state property under the State Property Act were not able to acquire state property without the permission of the Office of Administration. B acquired 22,00 lots of state land and managed it by borrowing or stealing the names of many people, such as type C, each class D, E, and F.

B In order to dispose of the State-owned land managed as above, B forged documents under the name of the third party, which were discovered to have been sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years by the court on August 28, 1986.

(B) On September 16, 1985, the Gwangju Regional Tax Office prohibited the buyer's change of state-owned land that was suspected to have been purchased under the name of another person by B around 1986.

However, B sold the state-owned land it managed to another person, and completed the registration of ownership transfer immediately in the name of the subsequent purchaser by forging the certificate of sale under the name of the director of the Gwangju Regional Tax Office, or filed a lawsuit claiming the registration of ownership transfer against the State by making the purchaser or the subsequent purchaser the Plaintiff, and subsequently, in accordance with the judgment in favor of the subsequent purchaser, the subsequent purchaser could transfer the ownership to the subsequent purchaser by completing

Since then, the aforementioned unauthorized disposal act was revealed, B was prosecuted under the name of the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), fabrication of public documents, uttering of forged public documents, fabrication of private documents, and uttering of falsified private documents on the ground that “B, even though it is not possible to transfer ownership normally, by deceiving the subsequent purchaser, received the purchase price, and forged documents.”

The Gwangju District Court and the Gwangju High Court are all guilty of the above crimes.