유족보상금부지급처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts to be filled or added. Thus, this shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
2. Parts used or added;
A. Three pages of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be followed as follows.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1-8 and 11 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)
B. The 5th 10th 10th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth
C. The following is added at least 6 pages of the judgment of the first instance.
E) If the court comprehensively examines the results of the examination of medical records entrustment to the head of the Ganman University’s medical clinic attached to the Ganman University and the fact inquiry results, the medical records, vehicle accident report, opinion, and diagnosis results, the deceased first is determined to have high possibility of having caused health problems in the vehicle. The probability of death of a patient with a high blood pressure without external shock, such as the deceased’s chronic renal failure, urology, urology, informed blood transfusion, and the patient with a high blood pressure, without external shock, can be presumed to have been twice the number of times compared to normal persons. In the case of the food room caused by a vehicle accident, the degree of external records of the corresponding accident, and the degree of external records of the body caused by the external force, in particular, the body part of the breast body caused by the external force, and the body part of the mother body, but the contents are not clearly presented.) According to the provisions of this court’s inquiry about the employment of a public official as a result of a physical examination, if a public official can be employed as a new public official.