When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 03:00 on February 9, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government District B District without a crypt type; (b) and (c) took three of the aforementioned restaurant operators C, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by publicly insulting the victim with the slope D belonging to the said district group, “If he/she is simped, simped, simped, simped, simped, and ring.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. C’s statement;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements by a complainant and to attach voice files for evidence);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;