(b) Violation of the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment.

Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government

Reference domicile Hong-nam District

2. Class B B (71 years old, South) and non-permanent.

Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government

Reference domicile Hong-nam District

However, the execution of the above punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended for three years from the date of the final judgment of this case.

Defendant Park ① 5,00,000 won from Defendant Park ② 5,000 won from Defendant Park ② and Defendant Park ② 5,000 won shall be collected respectively.

To order the Defendants to pay an amount equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

Defendant B shall be put on probation with respect to Defendant B’s Park and community service for 200 hours, Defendant B

each order of 160-hour community service for each case.

1. Violation of the Korean Racing Association Act;

A person who is not a marina society shall not assist in gambling using a racing conducted in a marina society.

피고인들은 성불상 AA와 함께 2013 . 3 . 중순경 서울 강서구 피의자들의 주거지에서 신종 사설 경마 프로그램인 ' 茶茶茶 ' 를 통하여 마사회에서 시행하는 경주를 이용한 사 설 경마장을 운영하되 , 성불상 AA는 불특정 다수로부터 도금을 송금받은 다음 위 금 액 상당을 위 ' ' 내 사이버머니로 충전하여 준 후 , 그로 하여금 위 ' ※※※ ' 에 접 속하여 위와 같이 충전된 사이버머니를 이용해 한국마사회에서 시행하는 경주 관련 마 권을 구입하여 우승마를 적중시키는 경우 마권구입자에게 한국마사회에서 제공하는 배 당률에 따라 배당금을 지급하거나 , 『 마권 구입자가 구입한 마권을 찍은 다음 해당 경 주마가 우승하는 등 그 마권이 적중되면 그 마권을 찍은 사람 , 일명 ' 찍새 ' 가 성불상 AA를 대신하여 해당 마권 구입자에게 한국마사회에서 시행하는 경주의 배당률에 따라 배당금을 지급하게 하고 , 비적중시 성불상 AA가 찍새에게 마권 구입자로부터 받은 돈 중 일부를 지급하는 일명 ' 찍기 ' 프로그램을 제공하고 , 피고인들은 찍새를 물색하여 성불상 AA를 통하여 제공받은 찍기 프로그램을 찍새들에게 제공하면서 찍새들이 찍은 마권이 비적중하는 경우 성불상 AA로부터 마권액의 3 % 의 수수료를 받기로 모의하였

(c)

From March 22, 2013 to April 3, 2016, the Defendants: (a) from around KimB et al. to around April 3, 2016, the Defendants sent KRW 8,348,960,40 in total over 2,300s to 13 accounts, such as the Defendant Park Jong-B’s name SC Bank account; and (b) provided KimB et al. with a program for referring to the above SB et al. to 13 accounts; and (c) provided KimB et al. with a program for 'using the aforementioned SCB’.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with AA in order to assist in gambling by using a racing conducted in a marina society.

2. Violation of the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment.

From December 25, 2015 to April 3, 2016, in aiding and abetting gambling using a racing conducted in marina society as described in the foregoing paragraph (1), the Defendants transferred KRW 296, 430,000 to the Agricultural Cooperative under the name of the highestCC via 150 times as described in attached Table 2. In addition, the Defendants pretended that the criminal proceeds accrue to the largestCC, a third party.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to pretend about the acquisition of criminal proceeds.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the selection of punishment for the crime;

Defendants: Article 50(1)2 of the Korean Racing Association Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act (abbreging and aiding in gambling); Article 3(1)1 of the Act on Regulation and Punishment, etc. of Criminal Proceeds Concealment; Article 30 of the Criminal Act (abreging in obtaining criminal proceeds); Article 30 of the Criminal Act (abreging in obtaining criminal proceeds);

1. Suspension of execution;

Defendants: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Probation and community service order;

Defendants: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. Additional collection:

Defendants: Articles 10(1) and 8(11) of the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment

Defendants: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

Reasons for sentencing

The criminal period of the Defendants is relatively long-term, the Defendants are against the Defendant, the Defendant Park Jong-chul had the record of being sentenced to a fine one time in the previous section, the Defendant Park Jong-chul had the record of being sentenced to a fine several times, the Defendant Park Jong-chul had no record of being punished in the previous section, and there was no record of being punished in excess of a fine, and the degree of participation in the crime in the instant crime is low compared to other accomplices who are the operator of the instant crime, and the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, should be considered.