However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around November 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) prepared a false lease contract stating that “The Defendant shall enter into a lease contract with the lessee, the Defendant’s son, the lessor, and the son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s 100 million son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s her son’s son’s son’s her son’s son’s her son’s her son.

As a result, the defendant was arrested for the purpose of having C receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Copy of the protocol of examination of suspect C by the prosecution;

1. Copy of each protocol of suspect examination of the police against C;

1. A copy of each police statement made against the defendant and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the copies of each complaint, a copy of a loan certificate, a copy of each certificate of transfer or takeover contract, a copy of real estate lease contract, a copy of a certificate of the personal seal impression, a notice of transfer or takeover of bonds and a certificate, a copy of a registration, a copy of inquiry about a loan contract,

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. The summary of the assertion and the defense counsel are as follows: C is a charter contract under the name of the defendant without the consent of the defendant (hereinafter “the charter contract of this case”); and