사기
The accused shall dismiss an application for remedy by the applicant for remedy of innocence.
1. On May 10, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on May 10, 2012, and the judgment was finalized on the 18th of the same month.
[ all facts] The defendant was issued seven arrest warrants across the country on Jan. 22, 2009 on suspicion of fraud, such as arrest warrant (the warrant request number 2008-752) (the warrant request number 2008-752) around 2007 and arrest warrant (the warrant request number 2007-167) (the warrant request number 2007-167). On Nov. 22, 2008, the defendant was arrested in the detention room of the Yongsan-gu Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office 2009, the defendant was arrested in the detention room of Busan District Public Prosecutor's Office 1338, Dong-gu, Busan District Public Prosecutor's Office 2009. The defendant was arrested in the above suspicion, etc., by requesting the defendant's victim, who was a civilian military employee in the military service, who was aware of inside the house, and requested the creditors to arrest the defendant's condition.
[Criminal facts]
1. The Defendant, who committed the crime of December 19, 2008, was arrested on or around December 19, 2008 as above, and was confined to the above arrest warrant (number 2008-752) pursuant to the above arrest warrant (number 2008-752), and was detained in the detention room of the Daejeon East-gu Daejeon Police Station, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, with the face of 670, at the interview room of the above police station, the victim D and G have the amount of KRW 40 million to E.
‘40 million won will be fully paid until January 30, 2009.
“A request is made instead of a loan certificate. On the other hand, a detention room will be held in the amount of KRW 40 million.
“.......”
However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the victims or E even if the victims have given E a certificate of loan in the name of guarantee for the defendant.
As above, the defendant deceiving the victims, and let them prepare a certificate of loan in the name of debt guarantee worth KRW 40 million E and 40 million on the same day, and the victims receive a claim for payment order worth KRW 40 million (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2010Da51450) from E.