소유권보존등기의 말소등기절차이행청구
1. The Defendant shall receive, on December 17, 2008, the Suwon District Court’s horizontal Housing Site Costs with respect to the Plaintiff’s 965 square meters prior to Pyeongtaek-si B.
1. The following facts can be acknowledged by taking into account the following facts: (a) there is no dispute between the parties; (b) evidence Nos. 1 to 4 (including each number); and (c) the fact inquiry results with respect to Pyeongtaek-si Branch of this Court into account the whole purport of the arguments.
The information about 10700 forest land in Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter referred to as "land before division") was restored to Gyeonggi-do Authenticity-gun E (No. 9 group 7) and F (1 group 1 group) after the incident of June 25.
After the completion of reclamation, F was subject to registration conversion into 965 square meters prior to G, and became a 965 square meters prior to Pyeongtaek-si B (hereinafter “instant land”).
In addition, on February 10, 1995, E had a procedure for the registration of ownership transfer in the Plaintiff’s name, and thereafter became 7,586 square meters in Pyeongtaek-si HH sports site after registration conversion and administrative district change, and was subdivided into H, I, and J.
B. The Defendant issued a public notice of non-real estate registration on the instant land on December 17, 2008, which was received on December 17, 2008, pursuant to the State Property Act (hereinafter “instant registration of ownership preservation”), and completed the registration of ownership preservation under the name of the Defendant (hereinafter “registration of ownership preservation”).
2. The Plaintiff’s judgment on the cause of the claim is the primary claim, and the land of this case is the co-inheritors’s joint ownership, such as the Plaintiff, Nonparty L, M, N,O, P, etc. who succeeded to K in succession after having received the Plaintiff’s condition of the land before the partition. Thus, the Defendant asserts that the Defendant, as a co-owner’s preservation act, is obligated to implement the procedure for registration of cancellation of the registration of ownership preservation on the land of this case, to the Plaintiff who exercises the right to claim
Therefore, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by adding the whole purport of the pleadings to the evidence mentioned above and the statements mentioned in Gap evidence Nos. 5 and Gap evidence Nos. 14 (including various numbers), i.e., the plaintiff's evidence investigation division as a net K, and the defendant's evidence investigation division as the defendant's head of the family and the inheritance of the family and the property, and net Q Q, as the deceased K.