Seized evidence 3 through 7 shall be confiscated.

The defendant is a person who operates a household manufacturing factory in Spocheon-si C.

No person shall use a trademark identical with another person's registered trademark on goods similar to the designated goods or use a trademark similar to another person's registered trademark on goods identical with or similar to the designated goods.

그럼에도 피고인은 2017. 3. 경부터 2017. 4. 19. 경까지 위 공장에서 재봉틀 2대 등을 설치한 후, 상표권 자인 ‘루 이비 똥 말 레 띠에’ 가 여행용 가방 등을 지정상품으로 특허청에 등록한 루 이비 똥 상표( 상표 등록번호 : 40-0330235)를 정당한 권한 없이 임의로 사용한 가방 19점을 제조하고, 루 이비 똥 가방 반제품 24점, 상표권 자인 ‘ 샤넬’ 이 서류 가방 등을 지정상품으로 특허청에 등록한 샤넬 상표( 상표 등록번호 : 40-0309448)를 임의로 사용한 샤넬 가방 반제품 38점, 루 이비 똥 가방 고리 20점, 루 이비 똥 앞 장식 28점 등을 제조를 위해 보관하는 등 시가 미상의 가짜 상품 총 129점을 보관하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the second public trial date);

1. Seizure records;

1. In cases of investigation reports (to attach photographs and photographs of seized articles in violation of the Trademark Act) and photographs attached thereto, investigation reports (to receive materials, such as written expert opinions) and written expert opinions attached thereto, investigation reports (to attach register of trademark registration) and the application of statutes of the original register of trademark registration attached thereto;

1. Article 230 of the Trademark Act comprehensively covers each of the relevant Articles of the Act and the selective trademarks of the punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 236(1) of the Trademark Act, committed an act of infringement of trademark right systematically and systematically for the purpose of economic benefits from the beginning;

It is difficult to see that there is a large quantity of similar products manufactured or stored by the defendant, and the defendant actually acquired by the crime of this case.