A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

A. The defendant alleged a mistake of facts in the facts charged of this case

At the time stated in the port, there is no fact that the victim's her her m, but does not go beyond the her straw, and there is a fact that the victim's face and head are drinking, but the number of times is not more than 30 but only 10 times.

In addition, as stated in paragraph (2) of the facts charged in the instant case, there is no room that the victim's face is a hand floor or the victim's head is faced with the trust of the victim, and the victim's face and head are exposed to the victim's face and head, or the victim's bridge and part are walking with the victim's face.

B. In light of the legal principles as to the violation of the Child Welfare Act, the Defendant’s act when the victim was injured and cannot be deemed as an abuse of the child’s body under the Child Welfare Act. However, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of this part of the charges, which erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the meaning of abuse, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion

C. The lower court’s sentence on the assertion of unfair sentencing (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and one hundred and sixty-hour community service work) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 대하여 1) 2013. 10.경 아동복지법위반 범행의 점에 관하여 원심이 적법하게 채택조사한 증거에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들을 종합하면, 피고인이 이 부분 공소사실과 같이 피해자를 때린 사실을 인정할 수 있다. 따라서 피고인에 대한 이 부분 공소사실을 유죄로 인정한 원심의 판단은 정당하고, 거기에 피고인의 주장과 같은 사실오인의 위법이 있다고 할 수 없다. 가) 피해자의 친모인 F은 경찰에서 '피고인이 2013. 10. 초순경 청주 국제공예비엔날레 매표소 앞에서 피해자의 엉덩이를 수회 발로 찼으며 집으로 돌아오는 피고인의 차량 안에서 조수석에 앉아 있는 피해자의 얼굴과 머리를 주먹으로 30회 때려...