1. On February 2014, the Defendant, along with C and D, found 50cc gate gate gate gate gate gate gate gate gate gate gate gate gate gate gate gate gate 100,000, which was parked in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, and tried to steal it. C and D reported gate 100,000,000,000 won in the market value of the victim G gate gate 100,000,000,000 won in the middle-gu, Daejeon, and C operated it.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the property owned by the victim together with C and D.

2. On February 15, 2014, the Defendant, along with C and D, discovered a 125cc c c c gate, parked in the middle-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, with the intent to steal it. C and D reported the network in their surroundings, and C and D reported the 100 c c c 1,200 c c c 1,200,000 won in the market price of the victim I owned by the Defendant, sticked to the c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the property owned by the victim together with C and D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant and C;

1. Each police statement made to G and I;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons above, such as the fact that discretionary mitigation reflects the reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act and the fact that the suspension of execution is in the period of suspension of execution for the same kind of crime.