강간상해,부착명령
2009Do7948 Rape Bodily Injury
209 Jeondo24 (Joint Attachment Orders)
*
Defendant and the respondent for attachment order
Public-service Advocates*
Seoul High Court Decision 2009No794, 2009 Jeonno9 (Consolidated) Decided July 24, 2009
209.9.24
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal by the defendant and the person subject to the attachment order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") and his defense counsel are also examined.
1. Ground of appeal No. 1
원심판결의 이유에 의하면 원심은, 이 사건 볌죄현장인 화장실의 문틀과 내측 입구벽면, 좌측 벽면에서 각 피고인의 지문이 발견되었고, 피고인의 운동화와 양말에서도 피해자의 혈흔이 검출된 점, 피해자가 범인식별 절차를 통해 피고인을 범인으로 지목한 경위 및 그 진술내용에 비추어 피해자의 진술이 상당히 신빙성이 있어 보이는 반면, 피고인의 변소는 진술의 일관성이 없고 선뜻 믿기 어려운 점 등 그 설시한 제반 사정들을 종합하여 판시 강간상해의 점을 유죄로 인정한 제1심판결의 결론을 그대로 유지하였다.
Such measures of the court below are consistent with the reasonable free evaluation of the judge of the fact-finding court, and it is sufficiently acceptable in light of the records, and there is no violation of the rules of evidence as alleged in the grounds of appeal.
2. The second ground for appeal
In light of all the circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the motive, method, and consequence of the instant crime, Defendant’s age, environment, character and conduct, and the circumstances after the crime, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the sentencing of the lower court cannot be deemed to be too unfair even if considering the circumstances in the grounds of appeal, even if it is considered in the grounds of appeal, is too unreasonable.
3. Conclusion
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Justices Shin Young-young
Justices Park Jong-hwan
Chief Justice Noh Jeong-hee