Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding the judgment as stipulated in paragraph (2) below. Thus, it is acceptable to cite it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2. In a case where it is recognized that the seal affixed on the document of this case concerning the determination of the formal evidence evidence of the lease agreement (No. 1) in addition, is a affixed with the seal of the name holder, unless there are special circumstances, it is presumed that the act of affixing the seal was done based on the name holder's intention. On the other hand, if the authenticity of the seal is presumed to have been completed, it is presumed that the document was made without the intention of the name holder's signature or the name holder's consent, and thus, it is presumed that the document was made without the defendant's actual proof against the intention of the name holder's written lease agreement and the probative value of evidence of this case is not sufficient to see the defendant's assertion that the document of this case is a legal act of G.