근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The Defendant, as the representative director of C Co., Ltd. in the facts charged, is an employer who runs the business of manufacturing motor vehicle parts by employing 20 full-time workers.
The defendant worked in the above workplace from October 13, 199 to December 8, 2017 and served as retirement allowances of D 43,284,228 won, and from May 2, 201 to December 28, 2017, and did not pay 20,287,680 won of retirement allowances of E that retired from office within 14 days from the date of retirement without any agreement on the extension of the payment deadline between the parties.
2. Article 44 subparagraph 1 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits and Article 9 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits: The judgment dismissing a public prosecution that submitted a written application for non-prosecution of punishment for victims after the prosecution under the proviso to Article 44 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.