A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) totaling KRW 12,305,000 (hereinafter “instant KRW 1”); (c) KRW 15,000,000 on July 21, 2015 (hereinafter “instant KRW 2”); (d) KRW 20,000,000 on September 30, 2015 (hereinafter “instant KRW 3”) up to five times from October 23, 2015 to November 11, 2015 (hereinafter “instant KRW 4,005,000; and (e) the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff a total of KRW 12,305,305,000,000 and KRW 305,005,050,000,000; and (e) the Defendant is obligated to pay damages for delay to the Plaintiff.

B. 1) In a civil trial on the first gold sources of this case, even though it is not bound by the fact-finding in the criminal trial, the facts found guilty of the same facts are valuable evidence. Thus, barring any special circumstance where it is difficult to adopt a criminal trial’s factual judgment in light of other evidence submitted in the civil trial, the facts opposed thereto cannot be acknowledged (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 97Da24276, Sept. 30, 197; 2007Da69148, 69155, Feb. 14, 2008). In light of the above legal principles, this part of the case is examined, and the defendant operated the assisted business, “C” in most cases with money lent by the plaintiff, and the defendant did not have any special property at the time, and had no funds from the plaintiff, and had no intent or ability to repay the money from the plaintiff to the 3th 13th 15th 2015.”

The above court is against the defendant on January 8, 2019.