beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.01.12 2016고단1839

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall provide game water for distribution or use, or display or store for such purposes, with contents different from those classified by the Game Water Management Committee.

Nevertheless, on November 18, 2014, the Defendant leased 45 of the DNA game machine, which is different from the classified contents, such as the following: (a) a certain animation, and a certain animation, and then stored in an information card chip; and (b) a separate execution file file, other than an execution file of the e-mail, installed on the e-mail, in which the game proceeds are carried out differently from the classified contents, such as where the e-mail takes place. The Defendant leased 45 of the e-mail game machine, which is run differently from the classified contents.

As a result, the Defendant distributed game water different from the rating of the game water management committee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect with respect to F; and

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of response to enforcement support;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 44 (1) 2, and Article 32 (1) 1 of the Act on the Promotion of the Alternative Game Industry, and Selection of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The sentence shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following factors: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; (b) the content of the instant crime; (c) the size of the game room in which the Defendant is involved; (d) the details of the punishment for those who run the game room; and (e) the fact that the Defendant has