2. The plaintiff's defendants who correspond to the above revocation part.

A. Defendant B operates the “D Sung-type Hospital” (hereinafter “instant hospital”), and Defendant C is a doctor working at the instant hospital.

B. On May 17, 2012, the Plaintiff, who was within the instant hospital, and was placed in a fluorial body, was consulted with the Plaintiff on the fact that the nose appears to have a large amount of the brue, and was under a cluoral surgery to improve it. On May 19, 2012, the Plaintiff received the cluoral surgery from the Defendant C, including melting cluor, dluoral, pluoral, and gluoral surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

C. The medical records of the instant hospital revealed that, from June 7, 2012, the Plaintiff complained of the Plaintiff’s symptoms to prevent nose and Defendant C confirmed the Plaintiff’s inside condition, but did not have any exceptional circumstances. On June 14, 2012, the Plaintiff complained of the Plaintiff’s crocum symptoms, and Defendant C confirmed the Plaintiff’s inside condition of crocum, but provided education to the Plaintiff so that the Plaintiff could promptly conceal the Plaintiff’s crocum at the time of pulmonation and education on the use of drugs that can improve the Plaintiff’s said symptoms.

1) On the other hand, on June 11, 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “patch fatitis fatitis fatum, catum fatum fatum, fatum degree, fatitis fatum, and batum fatitis fatum fatum,” as a result of the examination of radio photography, etc. by catch fatum fatum fatum fatum, and catum fatum fatum fatum,” with the above symptoms continued, and the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “catch fatch fatum fatum (mor non-satch fatch color)” as a result of the examination of radio photography, etc. conducted on July 31, 2012 by the above hospital’s diagnosis on the condition that “the catch fatum fatum fatum was expressed equally to the address, and it is difficult to the outer valves from the outer end.