If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant used the “D” in the “C” following the Internet portal site, and the victim E (the age of 24) used the “B” and “G” respectively.

1. 피고인은 2013. 1. 19. 14:31경 대전 동구 H 자신의 주거지에서 카페 게시판에 접속하여 닉네임 ‘I’가 게시한 “F 좀 또라이 끼가 있는 듯 애가”라는 제목의 글에 “내 말이 그거임 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 존나 미래를 보나”라고 댓글을 달아 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

2. At around 14:43 on the same day, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by posting the title “F is, i.e., ‘I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.”

3. 피고인은 같은 날 14:51경 같은 장소에서 카페 게시판에 접속하여 “원래 채팅하는 사람들은 좀 꽁기한 거 있으면 다 캡쳐하고 그래 ㅋㅋㅋ”라는 제목으로 “아니면 F 쟤만 저런건가, 대체 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 와 정신력 쩐다 캐치캐치, 캐치 날캐치”라는 내용을 게시하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant is a primary offender and reflects the sentencing, there are circumstances to consider that there was a disturbance in carpets due to the victims' mistakes, and that there was a direct crime in the atmosphere, and that there was almost a similar act with the defendant.