양수금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The plaintiff's assertion
A. The Defendant was granted a loan from mentmena Lenman Co., Ltd. on March 11, 2014, which led to KRW 50 million as of March 11, 201, and interest for delay at KRW 133,042,858.
B. On July 31, 2012, the Plaintiff acquired a loan claim against the Defendant from mentmena Loan Co., Ltd., and notified the Defendant of the fact on December 14 of the same year.
C. Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the principal and interest of the above loan to the plaintiff.
2. There is no evidence to prove that the judgment-based loan was lent to the Defendant as alleged by the Plaintiff.
(A) According to the evidence evidence Nos. 1 through 7, the acquisition amount claimed by the Plaintiff is deemed to have been extended to the money that was first lent by the U.S. to the Defendant, but there is no evidence to acknowledge that mentorrogenal loan, Inc., the final transferor creditor of the Plaintiff, re-acquisitions the above claim from the obligee who acquired the claim from the U.S. or U.S. Credit Union.). 3. The Plaintiff’s claim is without merit.