If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 8, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the traffic of the said alleyway by preventing the entry of the vehicle by linking the pipe, plastic light bags, and knife of 2.5m width of the said alleyway to prevent the entrance of the vehicle by preventing the vehicle from being allowed, even though the instant alley road, which flows from the village to C’s house (the length of eight meters, width of three meters) includes the site owned by the Defendant, even though it does not conduct a boundary survey.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning D;

1. Traffic obstruction site photograph;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 185 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.