When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Defendant is a herb pharmacist.

1. 한약사가 한약을 조제할 때에는 한의사의 처방전에 따라야 함에도 불구하고, 피고인은 C과 공모하여, 2012. 2. 1. 경 경남 하동군 D에 있는 E에서 한의사의 처방 없이 F 약국에 근무하는 C에게 “ 한약 약재인 반하 100ｇ, 후박 60ｇ, 소엽 30ｇ, 생강 80ｇ, 숙지황 300ｇ, 산약 150ｇ, 산수유 150ｇ, 백복령 120ｇ, 목단 피 120ｇ, 택사 120ｇ 혼합하여 한약을 조제해 달라” 라는 내용의 이메일을 전송하고, C은 피고인의 주문대로 한약을 조제한 것을 비롯하여 그때부터 2016. 6. 1. 경까지 별지 범죄 일람표 기재와 같이 위와 같은 방법으로 총 609회에 걸쳐 한의사 처방전에 따르지 아니하고 한약을 조제하였다.

2. Notwithstanding the fact that a person, other than a pharmacy founder, was unable to sell drugs, the Defendant, without establishing a pharmacy, prepared herb drugs as described in paragraph (1), and sold the herb drugs to G et al. for a total of 252,751,425 won from February 1, 2012 to June 1, 2016, as shown in the list of crimes in attached Table 209.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecutor with respect to the prosecution;

1. Each police statement in relation to H, I, J, K, L, M,O, P, Q, R, and other police statements;

1. Each written statement of M, K, L, S, and each other;

1. A report on the examination of each police suspect against T, U, V, W, and X;

1. Details of account transactions in the name of Y;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the e-mail output;

1. Article 95 (1) 3, Article 23 (6) (including preparation and combination of herb drugs without prescriptions), Article 93 (1) 7, and Article 44 (1) (main sentence) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Imprisonment with prison labor and a fine concurrently: Articles 93 (2) and 95 (2) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act;

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 (Establishment of a pharmacy with more penalty) of the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes.