beta
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2020.06.25 2020가합400829

대여금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 450,000,000 as well as 30% per annum from December 31, 2009 to October 25, 201, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The description of the claim is as shown in the annexed sheet of claim

(2) Applicable provisions of the Civil Procedure Act: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (by public notice)

3. Part of the term “A” appears to have claimed damages for delay at the rate of 30% pursuant to Article 5 of the No. 1 No. 1 No. 1 No. 1 No. 1 notarial deed (However, from October 26, 201, the Plaintiff claimed damages for delay at the rate of 25%). The maximum interest rate pursuant to the Interest Limitation Act shall be 30% per annum from June 30, 2007 to July 14, 2014 [the former Interest Limitation Act (amended by Act No. 12227, Jan. 14, 2014; hereinafter “former Interest Limitation Act”).

(1) Article 2(1) of the former Interest Limitation Act, Article 2(1) of the former Interest Limitation Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 25376, Jun. 11, 2014); Article 2(1) of the former Interest Limitation Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 25376, Jul. 15, 2014); from July 15, 2014 to February 7, 2018; Article 25% (amended by Presidential Decree No. 28413, Nov. 17, 2017); Article 2(1) of the former Interest Limitation Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 28413, Feb. 8, 2018) is 24% per annum (the Interest Limitation Act; Article 2(1) of the Interest Limitation Act; Article 2(1) of the Interest Limitation Act); and the portion of damages for delay in excess is null and void.