However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2014. 01. 17. 11:25경 보성군 B에 있는 ‘C단란주점' 앞 도로에서 피고인의 벌금 수배 사실을 확인한 보성경찰서 소속 경사 D으로부터 경찰서로 임의동행할 것을 요구받고 E 스타렉스 승용차 뒷좌석에 탑승하여 앉아있던 중 위 승용차의 시동이 꺼지면서 흔들리자, 화가 난다는 이유로 왼손 주먹으로 위 D의 머리를 1회 때리고 “이 씨발놈 뭘 쳐다봐. 눈구멍을 확 파버려. 이 씨발새끼.”라고 욕설을 하면서 손가락으로 위 D의 눈을 찌를 듯한 자세를 3회 취하는 등 폭행하였다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution ( normal consideration of the reasons for the suspension of execution);

1. Probation and the reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the decision of sentence] [Article 62-2 of the same Act] [Article 62-1 of the same Act] [Article 62 of the same Act] [Article 62-2 of the same Act] [Article 62-2 of the same Act] [Article 62 of the same Act] [Article 62 of the same Act] [Article 8, 2 years of suspended sentence, probation, community service, or 120 hours in light of the crime