The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant.

Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, it is justifiable for the court below to consider the facts as stated in its reasoning after compiling the adopted evidence, and to recognize the Plaintiff’s claim on the ground that there was a proximate causal relationship between the injury and the work of this case (e.g., acute lefymosis). In so doing, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in conflict with

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Lee In-bok

Justices Park Poe-young

Justices Kim Jae-han