When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On February 3, 2018, at around 01:00, the Defendant: (a) received a communication from the injured party under the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Building Section (hereinafter “D”) on the part of the damaged party C (hereinafter “D”) to leave the said restaurant; and (b) returned to the said restaurant; (c) the injured party left the Defendant and left the restaurant; (d) around 08:20 on the same day, the injured party left the restaurant; and (e) around 09:20 on the day of leaving the restaurant to work, the Defendant her employees of the said restaurant and the operator E (59 years of age) of the said restaurant after drinking alcohol; and (e) broken up two of the card terminal devices on the floor.

In this respect, the Defendant damaged the card terminal, the U.S. head of the equipment, and the U.S. head of the equipment.

2. On February 3, 2018, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) was arrested as a current offender on the act of paragraph (1) around 08:40 on February 3, 2018; (b) was arrested to the G police box located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul; (c) was under the influence of alcohol; and (d) took a bath to police officers at the above police box for about 50 minutes, namely, “Cropty typ gue, typ gue”; and (c) took a bath for drinking; and (d) took a boom, which is a public object managed by H, the police officer affiliated with the above police box, and destroyed the table bridge.

As a result, the defendant, who is a public object, damaged a guide bridge, and, while under the influence of alcohol, conveyed or slicked by very rough words and conducts at a public office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, H and C;

1. A criminal investigation report (fashing atCCTV images);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs (damages to property and damage to public goods);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of damage to public goods), Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (a point of disturbance of revocation in official document), and selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on December 16, 201, for reasons of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, of the Criminal Procedure Act.